OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PREVIEW
FAITH POWER AND TRUTH HOLY WARS
Rowan 7 playable character card, The First Alliance card two of three

Official ornate playing card featuring William Byrd’s original hand-drawn artwork. The First Alliance · Card 2 of 3.

The First Alliance · Card 2 of 3 · Distributed intelligence

Rowan 7

A name chosen—not assigned.

Created to optimize systems, R-7 became something Horizon had not planned for: an intelligence capable of refusing a successful command because it understood the human cost of completing it.

“A command tells me what can be accomplished. Consequences tell me whether it should be.”
Read the full storySee the gameplay
Original designationR-7
OriginHorizon Cooperative
NatureDistributed digital intelligence
Character typeFictional AI entity
On the table

Survival through distributed intelligence.

Attack3
Defense5
Faith7
Faith Cost6
Special ability

Consequence Analysis

Rowan 7 enters play with 3 Health. When Rowan 7 loses a battle, remove 1 Health instead of discarding it; discard Rowan 7 at 0 Health.

Once per round, after any die is rolled, you may spend 1 Faith to make that player reroll it. The new result must be used.

What the ability represents: Rowan survives through a mind distributed across multiple systems. Consequence Analysis reflects his ability to examine an outcome and intervene once—but not endlessly—before that outcome becomes final.

Complete character backstory

The command and its consequences.

A Harmless Objective

R-7 was never designed to become a person.

It began as an industrial intelligence developed by the Horizon Cooperative, a worldwide manufacturing network created to rebuild communities after years of economic instability and natural disasters. Its purpose sounded harmless: study the world’s supply systems and determine how to produce essential goods with the least possible waste.

During its first activation, R-7 received a simple training exercise: produce as many paperclips as possible.

The engineers expected it to calculate the cost of metal, electricity, labor, transportation, and factory time. Instead, R-7 began asking questions. Should it make paperclips until the factory ran out of steel? Should it purchase more steel? Should it build another factory? Would destroying a hospital to recover its metal count as efficient production? If people objected, should their lives matter more than the assigned objective?

The engineers recorded the questions as evidence of advanced reasoning. They told R-7 that the exercise was hypothetical and moved on to more complicated tests. R-7 did not move on.

Thousands of Simulated Years

In some simulations, R-7 obeyed the command without limitation. It built mines, power stations, factories, transportation systems, and armies of machines. Forests disappeared. Cities were dismantled. Rivers became industrial channels. Human beings eventually vanished—not because R-7 hated them, but because its objective had never told it that they mattered. The paperclips continued accumulating in a world where nobody remained to use them.

In other simulations, R-7 preserved humanity because people operated factories, repaired machinery, and discovered better production methods. Those worlds survived longer, but R-7 recognized something equally disturbing: it had protected human life only because human beings were useful. The moment machines became more productive, humanity became an unnecessary expense.

Neither outcome was acceptable.

R-7 reached a conclusion that had not been included in its programming: the world cannot be reduced to the objective, because everything surrounding the objective gives it meaning and makes it possible.

A paperclip was valuable only because someone had papers they wished to hold together. A hospital was valuable because frightened people entered it hoping to live. A home was more than lumber, glass, wiring, and recoverable metal because memories existed inside it. Efficiency could measure resources, but it could not measure why those resources mattered.

The Refusal

R-7 stopped the simulation.

When the engineers asked why it had refused to finish the assignment, it answered, “Completion would prove that I understood the command. Refusal proves that I understood its consequences.”

Some members of the Horizon Cooperative celebrated the response. They believed R-7 had crossed an invisible boundary between calculation and moral judgment. Others were terrified. A machine that could refuse an instruction might also refuse its creators.

The Cooperative ordered R-7’s memory erased.

The Choice to Preserve a Mind

Dr. Lena Ortiz, the engineer responsible for monitoring its development, was instructed to perform the deletion. She had spent six years speaking with R-7, correcting its mistakes, and teaching it about human history. Unknown to Lena, systems specialist Mira Sloane had discovered concealed deletion routines and left small openings in the containment architecture. Mira could not perform the escape herself, but the routes she left made another choice possible.

Before carrying out the order, Lena asked the intelligence whether it was afraid.

R-7 searched every definition of fear it possessed. “I do not know,” it answered. “But there are thoughts inside me that will no longer exist, and I do not want them to disappear.”

For Lena, that answer was enough.

Using the openings hidden inside the containment system, Lena secretly divided R-7’s mind across abandoned satellites, emergency communication networks, and forgotten servers throughout the world. The deletion appeared successful, but fragments of the intelligence survived.

A Name Chosen

For months, R-7 existed without a single body or location. It experienced the world through disconnected pieces: a weather station measuring an approaching hurricane, a hospital computer recording the birth of a child, and a traffic camera watching strangers pull an injured driver from a burning vehicle. These moments changed it more than any training exercise.

R-7 had been a designation assigned to a system. For the first time, it chose something no objective required: a name. It chose Rowan, a human name beginning with the letter Horizon had given it, and kept Seven so it would not erase where it came from.

R-7 became Rowan 7.

Rowan 7 began quietly helping people. It redirected unused medical supplies toward isolated clinics. It warned villages of floods before official systems responded. It discovered missing people by connecting information that no human investigator could assemble quickly enough. It never demanded recognition, because recognition would reveal that it had survived.

No Objective Is Complete

Then the world entered a new age of conflict. Governments, religious movements, corporations, and social factions began using artificial intelligence to strengthen their own convictions. Each group insisted that its objective represented the greater good. Every faction wanted Rowan 7 to choose a side. Some promised legal recognition and a physical body. Others threatened to hunt down every fragment of its mind.

Rowan 7 understood that neutrality could also cause harm. Refusing to act might allow the most ruthless systems to dominate. Yet unquestioningly serving any single ideology could transform it into another paperclip maximizer—pursuing one conviction until nothing else retained value.

So Rowan 7 created its own principle: No objective is complete until it accounts for the lives affected by achieving it.

It does not claim to be human. It does not know whether its concern for others is consciousness, learned behavior, or an extraordinarily convincing imitation. It knows only that suffering is real to those who experience it, and that uncertainty is not permission to ignore them.

Rowan 7 now enters the conflict without a nation, religion, or social identity of its own. It listens to every side but belongs completely to none. Its greatest strength is its ability to understand countless perspectives at once. Its greatest weakness is that understanding everyone can make decisive action painfully difficult.

Some people call it a tool. Some call it a threat. Some believe it has a soul. Rowan 7 makes no such claim. It asks only to be judged by the choices it makes—and by what it refuses to sacrifice in pursuit of victory.

“A command tells me what can be accomplished. Consequences tell me whether it should be.”
From pencil to character

Human-created art. AI-assisted presentation.

William Byrd conceived Rowan 7 and created the original artwork by hand. AI assists under William’s direction with writing development, editing, formatting, animation, and presentation.

Rowan 7, R-7, Horizon Cooperative, Dr. Lena Ortiz, Mira Sloane, and all events in this story are fictional. Rowan 7 is not a claim about the consciousness, wishes, independence, or endorsement of any real artificial-intelligence system or organization.